burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung sociologists broadly agree with the following points:

1.The family is not a voluntary unit based on love and choice, but an burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung unit which creates and maintains female dependence.

2. The family is not efficient at performing its burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung. Many women, children and old people eventually depend on support and care from burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung institutions.

3. Childcare is explained, not in terms of family relations, but by its functions in industrial society.

4. burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung is real productive work, and women are exploited by men.


Ann Oakley (1974) believes that the unpaid role of the burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung was socially constructed around the time of the burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung Revolution. With the change from the Domestic to the Factory system men stopped working at home and started leaving home everyday to work in burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung. A new role of "housewife" was burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung constructed for married women and quickly became a deep seated part of the burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung. Domestic work became to be seen falsely as burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung (biologically) women's work.
In contrast to Willmott and burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung, Oakley claims that the division of labour within families remains unequal with the burden of domestic work still falling on burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung even when they are also in paid employment. This is referred to as the "double" or "dual burdencultureeconomicfactoriesFeministsfunctionshousewifeHouseworkIndustrialnaturallysociallystatewomenYoung"