Gender and Differential Achievement Summary

Gap-fill exercise

Fill in all the gaps, then press "Check" to check your answers. Use the "Hint" button to get a free letter if an answer is giving you trouble. You can also click on the "[?]" button to get a clue. Note that you will lose points if you ask for hints or clues!

boys ceilings curriculum feminism jobs masculinity Masters outperform policy role socialisation subcultures workplace
Since the 1970's girls have experienced improvements in their academic performance in schools whereas have not experienced improvements. In higher education however males still females in terms of who gets the most "First Class" degrees and who goes on to and Phd level study.
Females are also still disadvantaged in the and women are underrepresented in top jobs despite their high achievement in schools.
Sociologists suggest that girls do well in schools for a number of reasons associated with , changes in societal attitudes, job opportunities and change. It is also claimed that teachers are more aware of the need for non sexist teaching because of the influence of in raising gender awareness.
Sociologists suggest that boys underachieve in schools because of changes in economic work structures leading to the decline of traditional male and therefore a "crisis of ". It is also suggested that boys develop counter school which hold them back because of a lack of positive models in the teaching profession.
Feminists dismiss the idea that boys underachievement is something new that should be tackled by social seeing it as a long standing historical issue. Feminists are more concerned with the remaining "glass " girls’ encounter in the world of work.